If you've ever run into the 128K token limit on GPT-4 Turbo right when you needed to include "just one more document" in your RAG system, you know the pain. TOON format was built for exactly this scenario—getting more data into your LLM prompts without hitting limits or blowing your budget.

Whether you're building chatbots, RAG systems, or AI analytics dashboards, these practical tips will help you get the most out of TOON's 50% token savings. Need the technical details? Check out ourTOON Format Specification.

Why Token Efficiency Matters for LLMs

Understanding the impact of token count on LLM applications:

1. Direct Cost Reduction

LLM APIs charge per token. GPT-4 costs $0.01 per 1,000 input tokens. A prompt using 2,000 tokens (JSON) vs 1,000 tokens (TOON) saves $0.01 per request - $10 per 1,000 requests, or $10,000 per million requests.

For production applications making thousands of daily API calls, token efficiency translates to substantial monthly savings.

2. Context Window Maximization

LLMs have fixed context windows (8K, 32K, 128K tokens). With TOON's 50% reduction, you can:

• Include 2x more data in the same context window
• Provide more examples for few-shot learning
• Add more retrieved documents for RAG systems
• Maintain longer conversation histories in chatbots

3. Improved Response Time

LLMs process tokens sequentially. Fewer input tokens mean faster time-to-first-token and overall response times. This improves user experience in real-time applications like chatbots and interactive AI assistants.

4. Better Output Quality

When you fit more relevant context within token limits, LLMs generate more accurate and comprehensive responses. More context = better understanding = higher quality outputs.

Best Practices for Data Representation

Use Structured Arrays for Tabular Data

Tabular data (customer lists, transaction logs, analytics) sees the biggest token savings with TOON:

❌ Inefficient JSON (152 tokens)

{
  "customers": [
    {"id": 1, "name": "Sarah", "mrr": 299, "churn_risk": "low"},
    {"id": 2, "name": "Michael", "mrr": 999, "churn_risk": "medium"},
    {"id": 3, "name": "Jennifer", "mrr": 99, "churn_risk": "high"}
  ]
}

✅ Efficient TOON (76 tokens - 50% savings!)

customers[3]{id,name,mrr,churn_risk}:
  1,Sarah,299,low
  2,Michael,999,medium
  3,Jennifer,99,high

Optimize Field Names

Since TOON declares field names only once, slightly longer descriptive names don't significantly impact token count:

# Good: Descriptive field names
customers[3]{customer_id,full_name,monthly_revenue,churn_risk_score}:
  1,Sarah Mitchell,299,0.15
  2,Michael Chen,999,0.45
  3,Jennifer Kumar,99,0.82

The LLM benefits from clear field names when processing the data. The small increase in header token count is offset by improved comprehension and more accurate responses.

Add Contextual Comments

TOON supports comments. Use them to provide context that helps the LLM understand your data:

# Customer churn analysis for Q4 2024
# churn_risk_score: 0.0-0.3 (low), 0.3-0.7 (medium), 0.7-1.0 (high)
customers[3]{id,name,mrr,churn_risk_score}:
  1,Sarah Mitchell,299,0.15
  2,Michael Chen,999,0.45
  3,Jennifer Kumar,99,0.82

Comments are minimal token overhead but significantly improve LLM comprehension of data semantics.

Prompt Engineering Strategies

Structure Your Prompts

Organize prompts with clear sections using TOON's hierarchical structure:

# Customer Analysis Request

instruction: "Identify customers at high churn risk and suggest retention strategies"

customer_data[5]{id,name,mrr,tenure_months,support_tickets,churn_score}:
  1,Sarah Mitchell,299,24,2,0.15
  2,Michael Chen,999,36,1,0.45
  3,Jennifer Kumar,99,6,8,0.82
  4,David Park,299,18,3,0.35
  5,Emma Wilson,99,3,12,0.89

analysis_criteria:
  high_risk_threshold: 0.7
  focus_metrics: "support_tickets, tenure_months, mrr"
  output_format: "markdown table with recommendations"

This structure gives the LLM clear context, organized data, and explicit instructions - all in a token-efficient format.

Few-Shot Learning with TOON

Provide examples efficiently using TOON's compact format:

task: "Classify customer sentiment from support tickets"

examples[3]{ticket_text,sentiment,confidence}:
  "Your product is amazing! Solved our problem perfectly.",positive,0.95
  "The interface is confusing and slow. Very frustrated.",negative,0.88
  "It works okay, but could use some improvements.",neutral,0.72

# Now classify this ticket:
new_ticket: "Been using your service for 6 months. Generally satisfied but recent updates broke some features."

TOON lets you include more examples within the same token budget, improving few-shot learning accuracy.

Chain-of-Thought with Data Context

Combine TOON data with chain-of-thought prompting:

sales_data[4]{month,revenue,new_customers,churn}:
  Jan,45000,120,15
  Feb,52000,145,18
  Mar,48000,110,22
  Apr,61000,180,12

task: |
  Analyze the sales trend and explain:
  1. Which months show positive momentum?
  2. What's the relationship between new customers and revenue?
  3. Should we be concerned about the March churn spike?
  Think step-by-step and show your reasoning.

TOON for RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation)

RAG systems retrieve relevant documents to augment LLM prompts. TOON significantly improves RAG efficiency:

Fit More Retrieved Documents

With 50% token reduction, you can include twice as many retrieved documents in your context:

• JSON: 8K context = ~15-20 documents
• TOON: 8K context = ~30-40 documents
• Result: More comprehensive context for better answers

Example: Knowledge Base RAG

user_query: "How do I reset my password?"

relevant_docs[3]{doc_id,title,content_snippet,relevance_score}:
  D1,Password Reset Guide,"Navigate to Settings > Security > Reset Password...",0.94
  D2,Account Security FAQ,"For password issues contact support@...",0.78
  D3,Login Troubleshooting,"If you can't login try the forgot password link...",0.71

instruction: "Using the relevant documents above, provide a clear answer to the user's question. Cite document IDs in your response."

Metadata in RAG Context

TOON efficiently includes document metadata (relevance scores, timestamps, sources) that helps LLMs assess information credibility and recency when generating answers.

Chatbots and Conversation Context

Chatbots benefit significantly from TOON's efficiency when managing conversation history:

Conversation History

conversation[5]{role,message,timestamp}:
  user,"What's my account balance?","2025-01-15T10:30:00Z"
  assistant,"Your current balance is $1,247.50","2025-01-15T10:30:05Z"
  user,"Can I transfer $500 to savings?","2025-01-15T10:31:00Z"
  assistant,"Yes, I can help with that. Confirm transfer?","2025-01-15T10:31:03Z"
  user,"Yes, confirm","2025-01-15T10:31:15Z"

user_context:
  account_id: "ACC-12345"
  account_type: "checking"
  available_balance: 1247.50
  savings_account: "SAV-67890"

Maintain longer conversation histories without hitting token limits. More context = more coherent responses.

Session State Management

session_state:
  user_id: "U-789"
  intent: "account_transfer"
  confirmed_actions[2]{action,amount,timestamp}:
    viewed_balance,0,"2025-01-15T10:30:00Z"
    initiated_transfer,500,"2025-01-15T10:31:15Z"
  pending_confirmation: true

LLM-Specific Optimization

GPT-4 / GPT-4 Turbo

GPT-4 handles TOON format naturally due to training on diverse structured data:

• Use structured arrays for tabular data
• Include clear instructions with TOON data blocks
• GPT-4 correctly interprets field definitions and row data
• No special prompting needed - format is self-explanatory

Claude (Anthropic)

Claude excels with structured formats like TOON:

• Add brief comment explaining TOON format on first use
• Claude's long context window (100K+) benefits from TOON efficiency
• Use TOON for large document processing and analysis tasks

Open Source Models (Llama, Mistral)

Smaller open-source models benefit even more from TOON's clarity:

• Explicit structure helps smaller models process data correctly
• Length markers reduce counting errors
• Field definitions make column-to-value mapping obvious

Measuring TOON Performance

Track these metrics to quantify TOON's impact on your LLM applications:

Token Usage Comparison

Use the OpenAI Tokenizer to compare token counts:

• Measure baseline JSON prompt token count
• Convert to TOON using our converter
• Calculate actual reduction percentage
• Project monthly savings based on API volume

Response Quality Testing

A/B test JSON vs TOON prompts with identical data to verify that response quality remains consistent or improves. Track accuracy, relevance, and user satisfaction metrics.

Latency Measurements

Record time-to-first-token and total response time for TOON vs JSON prompts. TOON's reduced token count should show measurable latency improvements, especially for large prompts.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Don't Mix JSON and TOON in Same Prompt

Use one format consistently within a prompt. Mixing formats confuses the LLM and negates efficiency benefits. Convert all data to TOON or keep everything in JSON.

Validate Length Markers

Incorrect length markers (e.g., items[5] but only 3 items) cause parsing errors. Use our TOON Validator before sending prompts to LLMs.

Don't Sacrifice Clarity for Tokens

While TOON is efficient, don't abbreviate field names to the point of obscurity.cust_name is fine, butcn harms LLM comprehension.

Test Before Production Deployment

Always test TOON prompts with your specific LLM and use cases before full deployment. Verify response quality, token savings, and latency improvements match expectations.

Implementation Checklist

☐Identify prompts with tabular or structured data (highest TOON benefit)
☐Convert sample data using JSON to TOON converter
☐Validate converted TOON with TOON Validator
☐Measure baseline token count with current JSON prompts
☐A/B test TOON vs JSON prompts for response quality
☐Calculate actual cost savings based on your API volume
☐Deploy to non-critical endpoints first
☐Monitor performance metrics (cost, latency, quality)
☐Scale to production after successful testing

External Resources

•
OpenAI Tokenizer - Test and compare token counts
•
TOON Official GitHub - Libraries and code examples
•
OpenAI Prompt Engineering Guide - Official prompt engineering best practices
•
Claude Prompt Engineering - Anthropic's guide to effective prompting
•
OpenAI API Pricing - Calculate cost savings with TOON
•
Prompt Engineering Guide - Comprehensive prompting techniques and strategies
•
What is TOON Format? - Introduction and basics
•
TOON vs JSON Comparison - Token savings analysis
•
TOON Format Specification - Complete syntax reference

Back to TOON Articles All Categories

TOON for LLM Prompts: Best Practices